Skip to content

Study

How to Turn Highlights Into Notes You Actually Use

A highlight is a promise to come back. Most are never kept. This method turns highlights into notes in three passes that take less time than rereading and produce something you can write from and revise from.

From highlight to note1Collect the highlights2Restate each inyour words3Connect and file4Test yourself later
An open book with a few short lines marked in yellow, next to a stack of blank index cards and a highlighter

Highlighting is fast and note-making is slow, which is why most people highlight and few make notes. The method here keeps note-making fast by working only from the highlights, never from the whole text, and by doing three specific things with each highlight instead of copying it. The result is a page of notes in your own words that you can revise from without opening the source, which is the test of whether a note is any good.

Pass 0: collect the highlights in one place

For a paper book, that place is a page in your notebook or a document where you type each highlighted line with a page number; typing them is already the first restatement, so do not skip it in favour of photographing pages. For PDFs, most viewers can list or export annotations (Acrobat's comment summary, or copy from the annotations pane). For web pages and e-books, a read-later app or annotation tool exports highlights as text; our guide to those apps explains the export options. If you used a colour code, keep the colours or tag the lines (claim, evidence, term) as you collect.

Pass 1: restate every yellow line in your own words

Take each claim highlight and write one sentence that says the same thing without using the author's phrasing. This is harder than it sounds and that difficulty is the point: you cannot restate what you have not understood. Where you get stuck, you have found the part of the text you did not actually read. Go back to that passage only, then write the sentence. Keep the original quote next to your restatement if you will need to cite it later; otherwise let it go.

Pass 2: connect and file

Now read your restated sentences in order. Under each, add the evidence (the green highlights) as a short phrase, not a quote: "trial of 1,200 patients, no effect" rather than the full sentence. Then ask two questions of each note. What does this connect to that I already know or have read elsewhere? Write the link as a line: "contradicts the Smith chapter on X" or "same mechanism as the essay on Y". And where does this belong? File the note under the question it helps answer, not under the book it came from. Books are how information arrives; questions are how it gets used.

Three highlights become one note and one term card.
Highlight (as marked)Note (after passes 1 and 2)
Yellow: "students who marked a large proportion of the text performed worse on inferential questions"Heavy highlighting hurts inference (Dunlosky 2013, p.19). Evidence: undergrad study, marked vs unmarked groups. Connects to: the isolation effect note. Filed under: why highlighting fails.
Green: "Fowler and Barker (1974)"Attached to the note above as evidence; no separate note.
Pink: "isolation effect"Term card: isolation effect = marked items remembered better partly because unmarked items are remembered worse.

Pass 3: test yourself, spaced

A note you never retrieve decays like anything else. Turn the pink terms into flashcards (question on one side, your definition on the other). Turn each restated claim into a question ("What does heavy highlighting do to inference?") and keep the questions in a list separate from the answers. Review the question list after a day, then a week, then a month, answering from memory before checking. This is practice testing and distributed practice, the two study techniques with the strongest evidence, and it costs a few minutes per session because you are working from a page of notes rather than a chapter.

A worked example, start to finish

  1. You read a twelve-page article on a PDF and highlight fourteen lines: eight yellow, four green, two pink.
  2. You export the annotations as a list (two minutes) and paste them into your notes file under the article's title.
  3. Pass 1: you restate the eight yellow lines. Two of them you cannot restate; you reread those paragraphs and discover you had highlighted the wrong sentence in one. You fix the note. (Twelve minutes.)
  4. Pass 2: you attach the four green lines as evidence phrases under the claims they support, add three connection lines to other notes, and move each note under the question it answers. (Ten minutes.)
  5. Pass 3: you write two term cards and eight questions. You answer the questions the next day (four minutes) and again a week later (three minutes).
  6. Total: under forty minutes for an article that took an hour to read, and you now have notes you can write from without reopening the PDF.

Tools that help (and one warning)

Any plain-text notes app works; the method does not depend on software. Read-later apps that export highlights automatically save the collection step for web reading. Flashcard apps with spaced scheduling handle pass 3. The warning: tools that promise to turn highlights into notes for you remove the restatement, which is where the learning happens. Let the tool collect; do the restating yourself.

Notes work best when the highlights behind them were chosen well, which is the subject of the colour code system for study and the evidence in what research says about highlighting. Both sit in the study hub, together with activities for teachers.

Common questions

How do I make notes from highlights?

Collect the highlights in one place, restate each main-point highlight in your own words, attach the evidence highlights as short phrases, connect each note to what you already know, then turn notes into questions and review them from memory over spaced intervals.

Should I copy highlights word for word into my notes?

Only where you will need to quote. Otherwise restate; copying preserves the author's words and skips the understanding.

How long should turning highlights into notes take?

Less than the reading itself. For a long article, twenty to forty minutes across the three passes, plus a few minutes of review on later days.

What is the best app for turning highlights into notes?

Any notes app you already use. What matters is exporting highlights as plain text and doing the restatement yourself. Read-later apps automate the export for web reading.

How often should I review my notes?

Answer the questions from memory after about a day, a week and a month. Increase the interval when you get them right; shorten it when you do not.

Sources

  • Dunlosky, J. et al. (2013). Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1).
  • Roediger, H. L. and Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning. Psychological Science, 17(3).
  • Cepeda, N. J. et al. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: a review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3).